FANDOM


  • Hi,

    This new pattern you entered seems to have the wrong number.  There is already a 1940s pattern with that number, and the number does not repeat in that decade.

    Is it possible the wrong number was listed by the seller?  The picture does not show enough of the envelope to correct it here.

    Best regards,

    tarna

      Loading editor
    • Hallo tarna, it's Always a pleasure to read from you :)

      well...I do not remember this pattern….have I entered it on the site? let me know…..

        Loading editor
    • to be more precise...I am the user raflesia….maybe it is one of the pattern from 'so vintage patterns' seller….can 'so vintage' be the one who entered the pattern?...I still do not remember it …

      he is selling it on his site…...

        Loading editor
    • I left this message on Petite Main's wall, not raflesia's...

      I am trying to resolve a numbers conflict.

        Loading editor
    • I Tarna, nice to hear from you. There's no way to find out if the seller got the number wrong because as I usually do, I checked on the Internet for copies of this pattern and didn't find any. It seems quite rare and is really beautiful. You're right, there's already a Simplicity 1954 from the 1940s, but it's a reissue of Simplicity 4365. Otherwise, looking at a Simplicity catalog http://what-i-found.blogspot.com/2009/04/simplicity-fashion-preview-1947.html the style and numbers seem to match the style and number of this one. 

        Loading editor
    • I agree, it is definitely from the late 1940s.  Hopefully, we will find the correct number for it some day (I think something may have been transposed).

      Best wishes,

      tarna

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.