(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Help desk}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> Unfortunately this wiki seems to have undergone s...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Unfortunately this wiki seems to have undergone some changes since the last time I contributed, and sections of it are no longer accessible to my browser (NetSurf 2.8| RISC OS). I'm not seeing any of the new editor facilities illustrated in the Help pages but just get a plain text box, which is fine for editing Wikipedia but doesn't let me get at the standard wiki features here (such as page edit history). |
Unfortunately this wiki seems to have undergone some changes since the last time I contributed, and sections of it are no longer accessible to my browser (NetSurf 2.8| RISC OS). I'm not seeing any of the new editor facilities illustrated in the Help pages but just get a plain text box, which is fine for editing Wikipedia but doesn't let me get at the standard wiki features here (such as page edit history). |
||
| − | As a result of this I can't add category data to complete my latest page [Simplicity_9751_A|Simplicity 9751]: even where a page has existing categories this doesn't show up as an editable section, and I can't find a way to create the section where it doesn't exist. This pattern ought to be at least under categories Simplicity, 1970s, Bridal, Wedding Dresses, Bridesmaid, Dresses, Ruffles, High Waist, Tie Ends, Bell Sleeves, High Neckline(?), Elbow-Length Sleeves and doubtless some others that I haven't managed to think of: I'd be grateful if someone could add them...[[User:HarrietBazley|HarrietBazley]] 18:54, March 17, 2012 (UTC) |
+ | As a result of this I can't add category data to complete my latest page [[Simplicity_9751_A|Simplicity 9751]]: even where a page has existing categories this doesn't show up as an editable section, and I can't find a way to create the section where it doesn't exist. This pattern ought to be at least under categories Simplicity, 1970s, Bridal, Wedding Dresses, Bridesmaid, Dresses, Ruffles, High Waist, Tie Ends, Bell Sleeves, High Neckline(?), Elbow-Length Sleeves and doubtless some others that I haven't managed to think of: I'd be grateful if someone could add them...[[User:HarrietBazley|HarrietBazley]] 18:54, March 17, 2012 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | Oh, and for some reason (doubtless I'm being very stupid), despite having demonstrably uploaded the file http://vintagepatterns.wikia.com/wiki/File:Simplicity_9751_A.jpg for use on this page I seem to be completely unable to get it to display inline rather than as a textual placeholder link :-( [[User:HarrietBazley|HarrietBazley]] 18:56, March 17, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 18:58, 17 March 2012
Unfortunately this wiki seems to have undergone some changes since the last time I contributed, and sections of it are no longer accessible to my browser (NetSurf 2.8| RISC OS). I'm not seeing any of the new editor facilities illustrated in the Help pages but just get a plain text box, which is fine for editing Wikipedia but doesn't let me get at the standard wiki features here (such as page edit history).
As a result of this I can't add category data to complete my latest page Simplicity 9751: even where a page has existing categories this doesn't show up as an editable section, and I can't find a way to create the section where it doesn't exist. This pattern ought to be at least under categories Simplicity, 1970s, Bridal, Wedding Dresses, Bridesmaid, Dresses, Ruffles, High Waist, Tie Ends, Bell Sleeves, High Neckline(?), Elbow-Length Sleeves and doubtless some others that I haven't managed to think of: I'd be grateful if someone could add them...HarrietBazley 18:54, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
Oh, and for some reason (doubtless I'm being very stupid), despite having demonstrably uploaded the file http://vintagepatterns.wikia.com/wiki/File:Simplicity_9751_A.jpg for use on this page I seem to be completely unable to get it to display inline rather than as a textual placeholder link :-( HarrietBazley 18:56, March 17, 2012 (UTC)