Lump them all under McCalls? Edit

The various spellings of McCalls/McCall's/McCall make it difficult to categorize all the patterns. I realize that the older pattern envelopes say "McCall" and that the more recent ones say "McCall's". It's very confusing. Perhaps we should lump all of them under "McCalls" (which currently has the most patterns)? The individual pattern pages would still capture the variation in their titles, which gives a clue as to the age of the pattern. Any thoughts? ChronicallyUncool 20:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.